Chilled Water vs. DX Systems: Choosing the Right Cooling Method for Your Commercial Building
Businesses across the country are facing climate extremes. In response, business leaders are exploring ways to deliver reliable, efficient cooling while reducing electrical waste. Commercial buildings must maintain a comfortable environment for tenants and workers, protect equipment, and ensure optimal indoor air quality.
Two of the most common options for addressing these needs are chilled water systems and direct expansion (DX) systems. While both methods can deliver excellent cooling performance, they work in different ways. Key differences include scale, efficiency, and installation cost. Factors that can significantly influence your choice, depending on your building’s specific needs.
When deciding between chilled water vs. DX systems, consider your building size, the climate, and your operational priorities.
Here’s a comparison of chilled water systems vs. DX systems so that you can make an informed decision.
What Are Chilled Water Systems?
A chilled water system uses a central chiller to cool water, which is then circulated through pipes to air handling units or fan coil units throughout the building. The chilled water absorbs heat from the indoor air, then returns to the chiller to repeat the process.
The advantages of a chilled water system include:
- Scalability: Ideal for large commercial buildings or campuses where central equipment can serve multiple zones
- Energy Efficiency: Can lower operating costs, especially in buildings with high cooling loads (some systems report savings of up to 20–30% over less efficient setups, depending on building use and system design)
- Design Flexibility: Supports complex ductwork and air distribution designs, which is especially useful for retrofits
However, there are some drawbacks, such as:
- Higher Upfront Cost: Installation is typically more expensive than a DX system
- Space Requirements: Needs room for a chiller plant and mechanical equipment
- Longer Installation Times: More piping and design coordination are required
If you are overseeing a large building, chilled water can be a long-term investment in efficiency and performance. They are particularly effective when paired with custom duct fabrication designed to suit your building.
What Are DX Systems?
A direction expansion system cools air directly by passing it over refrigerant-filled coils inside an air handling unit or packaged rooftop unit. The refrigerant absorbs heat from the air and transfers it to an outdoor condenser, where it’s released.
The advantages of a DX system include:
- Lower Initial Cost: Typically cheaper to purchase and install
- Faster Installation: Requires less infrastructure than chilled water systems
- Compact Footprint: Great for buildings with limited space for mechanical rooms
The drawbacks of a DX system include:
- Less Efficient for Large-Scale Cooling: Multiple units may be needed for big buildings
- Shorter Lifespan: Components may need replacement more often than a central chiller
- Zoning Limitations: Managing multiple zones is more complex without additional equipment
For smaller to mid-sized buildings, DX systems can be an economical option.
Chilled Water vs. DX Systems: Key Differences
Here’s a quick breakdown of chilled water vs. DX systems:
| Factor | Chilled Water System | DX System |
| Cooling Medium | Chilled water circulated through pipes | Refrigerant circulated directly |
| Best For | Large buildings | Small to mid-sized buildings |
| Upfront Cost | Higher | Lower |
| Efficiency | Higher for large loads | Lower for large-scale applications |
| Space Requirements | Large mechanical rooms and chiller plant | Minimal/distributed equipment |
| Installation Time | Longer | Shorter |
| Lifespan | Longer | Shorter |
Both systems have clear strengths. The challenge in choosing between the two arises when dealing with mid-sized buildings or retrofitting a historic space.
Climate and Cooling Load Considerations With Chilled Water vs. DX Systems
In hot, humid summers, large buildings with significant cooling demands often benefit from the efficiency of chilled water systems. These systems handle peak loads more effectively and can be more cost-effective over time when operating continuously.
For smaller buildings or facilities with variable occupancy, such as retail spaces or small offices, DX systems offer quicker installation. They are also more affordable up front and simplify maintenance.
If your facility houses sensitive equipment, both types of systems can be adapted with the redundancy and precision control you need to ensure uptime.
Maintenance Needs of Chilled Water vs. DX Systems
Ongoing maintenance and operational costs are key concerns when making such a significant investment. Chilled water systems require regular chiller maintenance. They will also demand periodic water treatment and pump inspections. However, principal components often have longer lifespans compared to DX systems.
A direct expansion system requires periodic refrigerant checks and coil cleaning. The compressors also demand maintenance. While individual air handling units may fail more frequently than a chilled water system’s core components, these issues can sometimes be isolated without affecting your entire building.
Either way, a preventive maintenance plan from a trusted commercial HVAC partner can significantly extend the life of your equipment and reduce the risk of emergency repairs.
Retrofitting Considerations
Upgrading HVAC equipment and other key electrical infrastructure can reduce your building’s energy intensity by 22%. When upgrading an older HVAC, the choice between chilled water vs. DX systems often comes down to the state of your existing infrastructure and your budget.
Retrofitting to a chilled water system may be the best option if:
- Your building already has extensive piping in place
- Expansion is on your mind
- There are tax credits or rebates for high-efficiency central systems
A direct expansion setup may be the right fit if:
- You want a simpler unit for phased renovations
- A lower initial investment better suits your budget
- You want a shorter project timeline
Retrofitting also presents an opportunity to add ductwork, insulation, and modern control systems that enhance energy savings and overall performance through automation and real-time monitoring.
Need Help Deciding Between Chilled Water vs. DX Systems?
At The Severn Group, our heating and cooling professionals understand the unique HVAC needs of commercial buildings. Our team can conduct an on-site assessment of your space to determine whether chilled water or DX systems offer the best return on investment, taking into account your building’s design, energy goals, and operational needs. Would you like to learn more? Contact us to schedule a free consultation.
Share